Stand in Awe at the Constant Unfolding of Time

Is it just me, or does time behave differently as you get older?

In my experience, the past and present blur together more as I approach 40.

When you climb a mountain, the ground you have already traversed can appear very different as you ascend. In the same way, incidents that happened years ago can now feel very immediate, sometimes more immediate than when they happened. And just as strangely, a moment in the present can feel as if I’m living it years ago. I had not observed that elongated dynamic of time earlier in my life.

Having kids has definitely impacted my perception of time’s passing. In a way, time slows down when your kids are young. You get this clear sense that your kids’ childhood is something sacred, perhaps as sacred as anything you will ever witness, and you feel the urgency to drink in their every word and action. But alas, despite your best efforts to live in the present, you realise this period of time will “slip through your fingers like sand,” to quote a slightly mawkish song we used to sing years ago.

Abraham Joshua Heschel, in reflecting on our tendency to lament life’s fleeting nature, used the word evanescent. Everything soon passes out of sight, out of memory, out of existence. Rabbi Heschel believes life’s evanescence is not something to bemoan, but rather an integral part of its beauty. The realization that life is slipping through our fingers like sand can actually motivate us, because we desperately want to appreciate something of its beauty and profundity. Now, all of time suddenly becomes holy. In the words of Heschel: “Who is worthy to be present at the constant unfolding of time?” Reading Heschel made me see that a central part of the human calling is to cultivate a worshipper’s stance as time unfolds.

Recently, on my way to work, I multitasked and listened to a voice note from a colleague as I drove. Maybe it was the stress of my frazzled schedule getting to me, but the predominant thought as I listened was, “What if I were listening to this the morning after he died?”

I am aware that my reverie was off-the-wall, possibly even certifiable behaviour, but don’t you agree it would be eerie to hear a recording of a dead person’s voice? Everything takes on a different sheen when it is seen in the light of our mortality, of time’s evanescence. No wonder so many mystics and monastics start their day with a meditation on death. Remembering life’s evanescent nature does not diminish our experience of the present, but rather expands it.

Imagine if we could go back in time and immerse ourselves in any point in our past, even if it were just for 5 minutes, and could experience it through the lens of what has subsequently unfolded (that routine introduction was actually you meeting your spouse, e.g.). We would be utterly transfixed. Every second would be pregnant with meaning! Sometimes I wonder if the afterlife won’t include reliving scenes of our lives, but with a panoramic view of the whole. (Obviously, I am not rooting that in orthodox Christian theology, though it is fascinating that numerous NDE’s report seeing their lives flash before their eyes.)

What does seem clear is that we must love the unfolding of time. We must love it all–the unpaid bills, our unfinished tasks and unrealised career goals, the quagmires of our human relationships, the turmoil of current politics. We must love it, knowing it is part of a mini-drama that is best understood as one united whole.

With this approach, anxiety about the current moment leads to hope and even worship because we remember our earthly sojourn is one interconnected story. Our mantra can now change from, “This season is really hard,” to, “The God who began a good work in you will also bring it to pass.” And we can stand in awe at the constant unfolding of time

Writing Prompt: Share Your Thoughts about Emojis

Ever since they entered common usage, emojis have given me a mild case of neurosis.

Somehow they feel fake to me, something we click on when we know we should respond but don’t wish to take communicative risks.

But give the devil his due. Surely there’s a time and place for niceties. Sometimes it’s just easier to select a little yellow face than wrestle those harsh chunks of text into intelligible sentences. Also, it is worth noting that the oldest languages are pictographic; the impulse to communicate with symbols and pictures precedes our embrace of alphabets.

I get all of that. I think my curmudgeonly attitude comes from my sense that emojis diminish our language skills more than they enhance them. I have the distinct, though perhaps unfounded, impression that we are now more tepid in our written correspondence.

Because of their sizzle and flair, emojis, rather like all caps, can give us the illusion of being expressive. But selecting a picture, even if we choose from a smörgåsbord of options, doesn’t usually make demands on us. And if it’s true that love requires sacrifice, then what is the quality of that kind of communication?

My theory is that with a truly pictographic language, people are less likely to be relationally lazy. For starters, the symbols and pictures in their languages are far more varied and complex than the ones in English. Whereas in our own linguistic evolution emojis mostly create anxiety and mess with reality. (Insert snooty arched-brow emoji.)

I will never forget listening to an interview with a man who co-designed the heart emoji for likes on social media. If memory serves, his name was/is Sean Parker and he worked for Facebook. He admitted that he and his colleagues designed the heart emoji to trap people into using Facebook more frequently and compulsively. They hoped users would not only post, but that they would return to it multiple times to see how many likes it received (or for some poor schmucks, to see if it got any likes at all). Their goal was literally to create pathologies among the citizenry.

I too want to show warmth and affirmation when I communicate (well, usually anyway), but I remain unconvinced that emojis are the only way, or even the best way, to do it. It’s a cliche, but the best communication happens face to face. Alternatively we could, heaven forbid, revive the quaint practice of calling someone. Not to get all sentimental, but at least when we still called people, we could hear voice inflection. (A version of calling has survived, namely leaving voice notes, though modern etiquette seems to condemn the tedious, podcast-length messages and perhaps for good reason.)

Sometimes written communication is necessary. When it is, we should roll up our sleeves and invest at least a modicum of thought and creativity. If a shiny emoji facilitates this endeavour then sobeit.

Riddle: What sets humans apart from beasts, AI, and demagogues? Answer: Their ability to communicate with all the elements of real communication.

With words and emojis alike, they are useful only to the degree that they help us accomplish that goal.