What Humility Is and Isn’t (But Then I Could Be Wrong)

Humility, much like life itself, is a treacherous maze.

On one hand, we don’t want to view ourselves with self-loathing. What kind of lame-o (fun American epithet) would go through their decades of existence on this crazy planet of ours and never come to terms with who they are. Not me, that’s for sure! No, seriously though, I want to stand in front of a mirror and say, “I like such and such thing about myself,” and for that to feel perfectly acceptable. Or with some quirk I have, to enjoy it and say, “I’m really glad I do/think this.” The problem is that we all tend to veer off into self-absorption, and nobody likes a prick, now do they?

Nothing is more attractive than humility, and nothing is more unattractive than pride. Someone who is humble is self-aware, which is worlds apart from self-absorbed. In fact, we are drawn to people who are self-aware. A self-aware person may realize they have a talent most people in the room don’t share, but they also understand the context of why that’s true. They know that every desirable trait comes with a trade-off. They are equally aware of what they have and what they don’t have. They know that if they have a special gifting, they probably lack something else, unless they’re flippin’ Leonardo da Vinci. That guy could do it all.

Humble people know any human feat comes with a lot of luck, with a lot of stars aligning. It awes me to no end to see someone demonstrate a near god-like knowledge or ability that I hadn’t even known they possess. It’s very un-American to do that. We Americans just plunk our cards onto the table. We’re often bombastic and averse to subtlety (unlike the ‘b’ in subtlety, it’s very subtle), whereas Europeans can be so annoyingly mysterious. A German, for instance, might apologize for not having better English, but then it will emerge that they hold a deeper understanding of the mechanics of the English language than we could ever hope to have, along with fluency in at least three other languages. But then we Americans gave the world Scrabble, and that’s not nothing. A gentleman by the name of Alfred Butts invented it, during the Great Depression when money was hard to come by. You can check Mr. Butts’ story out for yourself if you are so inclined.

Once when an old friend of mine was training to become a pilot, I was having dinner at his house and we were discussing it. His dad happened to be there, too, and he made a joke–at his son’s expense, really. He posed the question: “How do you know when there’s a pilot in the room?” Then looking at his son out of the corner of his eye, in a slightly non-self-aware manner, he delivered the punchline: “They’ll tell you.” He had a point. I still feel incriminated to this day, although I have never even once pretended to be a pilot. Rather, I know that when I speak to you about some topics, I’ll exhaust the extent of my knowledge or ability in fifteen seconds, rather than building up to it. Sorry about that! I promise to work on it.

I read a book by a Buddhist monk who said we stay humble by remembering that we’re all interconnected and we’re all equally mortal. Each passing day brings us that much nearer to the day of our death. All of us. And we all die alone. How’s that for a bit of uplift on a Monday? We struggle into the world alone, and we shall also struggle out alone. You’ve got to walk that lonesome valley/you’ve got to walk it by yourself. Thus our lives are bookended by suffering, by crushing, poignant suffering that is more than any mortal should have to bear, let alone billions of us. It should make us all more compassionate toward each other.

And you’d think it would. Make us more compassionate. Knowing we are all finite mortals who could easily keel over this very day at the drop of a hat, you’d think it would. It behooves us (which is a semi-archaic expression that can also be written behoves us) to be less judgmental, less competitive, and ultimately less proud.

That doesn’t mean we can’t have a little healthy swagger. Humility doesn’t have to cancel out swagger, and in fact swagger can be endearing, in small doses, though Elon Musk probably overdoes it. His main achievement was becoming the world’s most memorable man-child, a difficult feat given today’s crowded field of contenders. Yes, yes, electric car corporations and clean energy and all that, but let’s not forget that he, as the man who controls more money than any other individual in history, bought the votes needed to elect a squat ogre with a front-butt as president, the latter being an individual I don’t necessarily hate, I just see the role of volunteer parking attendant for a mid-sized town’s summer parade as a better fit for him than US president. That said, some pretty strange people have occupied the office in the past. Anyway, that’s sort of off topic. Back to legitimate swagger, you know who really deserves to swagger? People who can parallel park an electric car, or a chip-oil car, or any car really. I find it oddly impressive to watch them look into their rearview, doff their hair suavely, and then coolly navigate into spaces nobody else even attempts. That way they spend less time searching for parking spaces and walking to their appointments. Something like that, if you swagger about that, you’ve earned it. I respect good parallel-parkers with just the right amount of swagger, if you want to know the truth.

Humility also doesn’t cancel out dignity. Dignity is different from arrogance. Every time we meet another person, we set out our stall. We greet them, in subtle ways (at least if you’re European), announcing to them our vision of reality. That’s not pride, that’s dignity. That’s bearing the image of the Divine faithfully, to the best of our current understanding as to how it should be borne.

What Is God Interested In?

For reasons I haven’t fully processed, I am put off by Answers in Genesis.

The organisation behind the enormous replica of Noah’s Ark as well as the Creation Museum, they are a major reason why tourists come to Kentucky every year. Their founder Ken Ham is famous for his interpretation of Genesis which holds that the universe was created 6,000 years ago in six 24-hour days.

Recently, I sent Answers in Genesis an email asking them how they can believe Genesis is one straightforward, encyclopedia-style recounting of natural history when there are in fact two different creation accounts in the first and second chapters of Genesis. The differences are not minor either; they include the sequence of creation, the method of creation and the way God is portrayed. This was not made up by some Bible scholar, it is there for all to see.

The gentleman who answered my email was civil and kind, probably more so than I had been in my original email, and for a moment I wondered if my dislike for Answers in Genesis is an overreaction. After all, one could conceive of worse tourist attractions, like celebrating slavery, for instance.

Yet I have to wonder if the endeavour is a net positive. In taking the position they have, Answers in Genesis shut themselves off from many of humanity’s finest minds, of both religious scholars and scientists from several different continents who independently came to their conclusions about the theory of evolution. And goodness knows the amount of seekers who, having a genuine curiosity about the Christian faith, are thwarted in their search because of the untenable version of Christianity they encounter on the Ark.

Musing further, I wondered what would happen if the organisation changed its name to Questions in Genesis and created a space where people could wrestle with this magnificent, multi-layered origins story. Would this not be better than condemning people who doubt Ken Ham’s novel interpretation of Genesis? Better than comparing such people who mocked Noah’s Ark, as Answers in Genesis blatantly does? (Their interpretation of the Genesis flood story is another matter entirely but let’s not go there.)

Perhaps too smugly, I comforted myself that I don’t mislead people by mapping modern questions onto Genesis. Yet while Answers in Genesis may be guilty of using the Bible to promote a fear-based agenda, they are not the only ones to have done so. Too often I also cling to positions that shut down communication and connection. We all, from time to time, retreat or refuse to engage with those who differ from us.

Some would say this response is natural and even partially good. How else does a child learn who and what to trust? How else would our hunter-gatherer ancestors have dealt with dangerous wild animals? (My apologies for that last question, Answers in Genesis–I know it’s a non-starter for you.)

Yet the organisation’s obsession with treating the Bible as an answers dispenser that shuts down honest inquiry does remain a problem. The thing with answers is that we can memorise them, know them inside and out, and master them. But what if the Bible was meant to unsettle and deeply disorient us before it yields up answers of any sort?

Is it possible to learn more of the Bible’s contents even as we grow increasingly ignorant of its purpose? As Dallas Willard once asked, “Has our presumed familiarity led to unfamiliarity, our unfamiliarity to contempt, and our contempt to profound ignorance?”

Any interpretation of the Bible that prioritises correct doctrine over authentic connection with God and our fellow image-bearers is a wrong interpretation. Not only is it a wrong interpretation, it is a harmful interpretation, a net negative, a destructive force unleashed in society.

Whatever my position, even I justify it by claiming obedience to God, if it does not nurture my everyday flesh-and-blood relationships, it is only a resounding gong and a clanging cymbal.

I began this post by giving my tuppence about Answers in Genesis. I implied that God is not interested in a project that is so self-serving and narrow-minded. But I am not so arrogant to think that I am morally superior. I am self-aware enough to know I also have things in my life God isn’t interested in.

God isn’t interested when I go to great lengths to prove I am more correct, or more sophisticated, or more enlightened, or more authentic than my neighbor. God is not interested in my storing up of grievances, my keeping track of the sins my family members or acquaintances have committed against me. God is not interested in a faith that says love God but not the creation, or love humanity but not the humans God places around us. God is not even interested in my knowledge of the Bible if it only serves to prop me up and make other people seem benighted, hell-bound or both.

The God revealed in Jesus is interested in our humility and contrition more than our being right; in our connection with others, not sitting in judgment of them; in mercy, not in sacrifice.

On this truth hang all the law and prophets.